Interference canceling matched filter (ICMF) and related methods

ABSTRACT

An interference cancelling matched filter (ICMF) may include an antenna array for receiving a signal burst including a training sequence therein, and an adaptive space-time filter connected to the virtual antenna array and having settable filter coefficients. The ICMF may further include a channel impulse response estimator for estimating a channel impulse response based upon the training sequence, and a signal blocker operatively connected between the channel impulse response estimator and the adaptive space-time filter so that the filter coefficients thereof are set based upon the training sequence and not the whole signal burst.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.60/708,298, filed Aug. 15, 2005, which is hereby incorporated herein inits entirety by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to wireless communications systems, suchas cellular communications systems, and, more particularly, to filteringreceived wireless signals to reduce unwanted interference.

BACKGROUND

Interference canceling matched filters (ICMF) have been investigated tomeet requirements for a Downlink Advanced Receiver Performance (DARP)that is standardized by the third generation mobile communicationssystem and the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP). Some ofthese proposals are set forth in the following articles and documents:

-   -   1. Slock et al., An Interference Cancelling Multichannel Matched        Filter, Globecom November 1996;    -   2. Trigui et al., Cochannel Interference Cancellation Within The        Current GSM Standard, IEEE IC on Universal Personal        Communications, 1996;    -   3. Griffiths et al., An Alternative Approach to Linearly        Constrained Adaptive Beamforming, IEEE Trans. AP-30, No. 1,        1982;    -   4. Pukkila et al., Cochannel Interference Suppression for        Constant Modulus Signal, IEEE ICC-2004; and    -   5. Liang et al., A Two-Stage Hybrid Approach for CCI/ISI        Reduction with Space-Time Processing, IEEE Communication Letter        Vol. 1, No. 6, November 1997.

Current Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) cellular systemshave to address the co-channel interference (CCI) on the mobile station(MS) side, as well as address the DARP requirements. Some single channelstructures and pre-filters have been used to aid in canceling theinterference and provide some channel impulse response (CIR) estimation.Moreover, some systems have used maximization of thesignal-to-interference to design jointly a single channel space-timefilter and the CIR estimation for a single channel. Other systems haveused a constrained minimization of the mean-square error to design asingle channel space filter. Other systems have used a single channelspace filter that is designed by a rank-one approximation of the MLchannel estimation. The target applications for these systems have beena base station where a physical antenna array including a plurality ofantennas is available.

An ICMF performs “blind” interference cancellation (BIC), as it does notneed the knowledge of the channel response of the interferers. Yet, thechannel response of the wanted or desired signal still has to be knownor be estimated. Further details of the ICMF may be found in an articleby Slock et al. entitled “An Interference Canceling Multichannel MatchedFilter,” IEEE, pgs. 214-218, November 1996. Moreover, the potentialapplication of ICMFs to Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM)Single Antenna Interference Cancellation (SAIC) is discussed in andarticle to Slock et al. entitled “Cochannel Interference CancellationWithin the Current GSM Standard,” IEEE International Conference onUniversal Personal Communications, 1996.

Despite the advancements in ICMF systems, channel estimation may stillbe problematic, and thus the DARP requirements difficult to achieve.Accordingly, further advancements in the use of ICMFs in cellulartelephone applications, particularly for DARP-compliant devices, aredesirable.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B are schematic block diagrams of a GSM receiver inaccordance with the prior art and a DARP-capable ICMF GSM receiver inaccordance with one exemplary embodiment, respectively.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of the ICMF and channel estimator ofFIG. 1B illustrated in greater detail.

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of the Wiener filter of FIG. 2illustrated in greater detail.

FIG. 4 is a graph of simulated mean-squared-error (MSE) vs.signal-to-interference ratio for the channel estimator for variouschannel estimation techniques.

FIG. 5 is a graph of simulated performance results for the DARP-capableICMF GSM receiver of FIG. 2.

FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of an alternative embodiment of theICMF and channel estimator of FIG. 2.

FIGS. 7 and 8 are flow diagrams of ICMF methods using the ICMF andchannel estimator of FIG. 5.

FIG. 9 is a schematic block diagram of an exemplary model wirelesscommunication device in which the DARP-capable receiver of FIG. 1B maybe used.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present description is made with reference to the accompanyingdrawings, in which preferred embodiments are shown. However, manydifferent embodiments may be used, and thus the description should notbe construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather,these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thoroughand complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and primenotation is used to indicate similar elements in different embodiments.

In accordance with one embodiment, Co-Channel Interference (CCI) on amobile station (MS) side in a current Global System for Mobile (GSM)communications system is addressed, as well as the compliant requirementof a Downlink Advanced Receiver Performance (DARP) standard by the ThirdGeneration Partnership Project (3GPP).

Generally speaking, an interference cancelling matched filter (ICMF)system is described herein which may include an antenna array forreceiving a signal burst including a training sequence therein, and anadaptive space-time filter connected to the virtual antenna array andhaving settable filter coefficients. The ICMF system may further includea channel impulse response estimator for estimating a channel impulseresponse based upon the training sequence, and a signal blockeroperatively connected between the channel impulse response estimator andthe adaptive space-time filter so that the filter coefficients thereofare set based upon the training sequence and not the whole signal burst.

The signal blocker may subtract a re-modulated training sequence fromcorresponding received signals. More particularly, the signal blockermay include a summer and a convolver connected thereto, and theconvolver may re-modulate the training sequence by convolving thetraining sequence with the estimated channel response. Furthermore, theantenna array may be a virtual antenna array, for example. In addition,the adaptive space-time filter may include a Wiener filter forgenerating an interference estimation, and the adaptive space-timefilter may further include a summer for subtracting the interferenceestimation from the received signal burst.

By way of example, the channel impulse response estimator may estimatethe channel impulse response based upon a cross-correlation of thetraining sequence and the received signal burst. The channel impulseresponse estimator may also estimate the channel impulse response usinga least-square channel estimation based upon the training sequence. Theestimation of the channel impulse response may also be based upon amaximization of a signal-to-noise ratio of the received signalscorresponding to the training sequence. In addition, the channel impulseresponse estimator may estimate the channel response based upon constantmodulus interference removal, and optionally based upon an Eigenvectordecomposition estimation as well.

An interference canceling matched filtering method may include receivinga signal burst including a training sequence therein using an antennaarray, and estimating a channel impulse response based upon the trainingsequence. The method may further include filtering the received signalburst using an adaptive space-time filter having settable filtercoefficients, and performing signal blocking on the received signalburst so that the filter coefficients of the adaptive space-time filterare set based upon the training sequence and not the whole signal burst.

Also, a wireless communications device may include a wirelesstransmitter and a wireless receiver. In particular, the wirelessreceiver may include an interference cancelling matched filter such asthe one described briefly above.

Referring initially to FIG. 1A, by way of reference a conventional GSMreceiver 20 includes a derotator 21 into which a received GSM signal isinput, and a matched filter 22 connected to the output of the derotator.A channel estimator 23 is also connected to the output of the derotator21 and to the matched filter 22, and a Viterbi equalizer 24 is connectedto the outputs of the matched filter and channel estimator.

By way of comparison, a DARP-capable GSM receiver 30 in accordance withone exemplary embodiment is now initially described with reference toFIG. 1B. The DARP-capable GSM receiver 30 illustratively includes anICMF 32 connected to the output of the derotator 21, and a channelestimator 33 also connected to the output of the derotation stage and tothe ICMF. As schematically illustrated in the drawing, the ICMF 32 andchannel estimator 33 may advantageously be inserted into the typical GSMreceiver configuration in place of the matched filter 22 andcorresponding channel estimator 23 without the need to change thestandard derotator 21 and Viterbi equalizer 24, as will be appreciatedmore fully from the discussion below.

Generally speaking, the present ICMF SAIC approach uses the input dataas though there were several “virtual” input antennas. It then usestraditional beam-forming techniques to combine the virtual antennas toimprove the signal-to-interference-noise ratio (SINR) for the desiredsignal. Considered alternately, the SAIC ICMF 32 functions as anadaptive space-time filter.

More particularly, the premise behind the SAIC ICMF 32 is that byexploiting oversampling and the BPSK nature of the GMSK signal, avirtual antenna array can be established. Once the virtual antenna arrayand the knowledge of the channel response of the wanted signal isestablished, conventional beamforming technology can be used for theinterference cancellation. The underlying assumption for the beamformingis that the interference is spatially or/and temporally correlated andit arrives at different paths from the wanted or desired signal. Thisassumption is statistically true in the GSM fading environment. However,it should be noted that in some embodiments an array of real antennas(i.e., without oversampling) may be used. The beamforming algorithm usedin the ICMF 32 may be based on the Generalized Sidelobe Canceller (GSC)as disclosed in the Griffiths et al. article entitled “An AlternativeApproach to Linearly Constrained Adaptive Beamforming,” IEEE Trans.Antennas Propag., vol. AP-30, pp 27-34, January 1982.

Referring now to FIG. 2, the SAIC ICMF 32 and channel estimation stage33 are now described in further detail. The ICMF 32 includes a mainbranch 40 of the virtual antenna array, a signal blocking branch 41 ofthe array, and a 2D (i.e., virtual spatial and temporal) adaptive Wienerfilter 42.

The virtual antenna array results from the oversampling of the receivedsignal and the separation of the real (I) and imaginary (Q) parts of thesignal. In the illustrated embodiment, the signal y_(0R)(k) is the “onsample” real signal component, y_(0I)(k) is the on sample imaginarysignal component, y_(1R)(k) is the “off” or “over” sample real signalcomponent, and y_(1I)(k) is the off sample imaginary signal component.As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the oversampledsamples y_(1R)(k), y_(1I)(k) may be treated as independent channels ofthe antennae. The rationale behind the separation of the I/Q parts isdue to the nature of the GMSK modulation. After derotation, the GMSKsignal may be treated as a BPSK signal, and hence the I and Q channelsare considered independent to some extent (although the intersymbolinterference (ISI) compromises this assumption somewhat).

In a GSC beamformer, the main branch is a conventional receiver filter.In the ICMF 32, the main branch 40 is a multi-channel matched filterincluding respective filters 43 a-43 d for each of the signal componentsy_(0R)(k), y_(0I)(k), y_(1R)(k), and y_(1I)(k), and a summer 44 forsumming the outputs of the filter blocks. The output x_(O)(k) of themain branch 40 (i.e., the summer 44 output) contains both the wanted ordesired signal and the undesired interference. The wanted signal isenhanced in the main branch 40 because of the summation of thephase-aligned signal of the matched filter output, as will beappreciated by those skilled in the art.

The signal blocking branch 41 implements a transformation that generatesa group of sub-channels x₁(k), x₂(k), and x₃(k) including only theinterference. More particularly, the signal blocking branch 41implements a blocking transformation using a plurality of signalblocking filters 45 a-45 f and summers 46 a-46 c and corresponding to atransformation matrix T(z) defined as follows:

$\begin{matrix}{{T(z)} = {\begin{bmatrix}{H_{0I}(z)} & {- {H_{0R}(z)}} & 0 & 0 \\{H_{1R}(z)} & 0 & {- {H_{0R}(z)}} & 0 \\{H_{1I}(z)} & 0 & 0 & {- {H_{0R}(z)}}\end{bmatrix}.}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

Generally speaking, the blocking algorithm finds the null space in theobservation space of the array. Assuming there are N virtual antennae,the dimension of the null space would be N−1 since there is only onewanted signal (i.e., the dimension of the signal space is one). Itshould be noted that other approaches may be used to form differenttransformation matrices, if desired, as will be appreciated by thoseskilled in the art.

Turning now to the adaptive space-time Wiener filter 42, space-timetwo-dimensional processing is used because, relative to the samplingrate, the interference is broadband. Using time domain filtering willcompensate for the delays caused by the signal blocking filters 45 a-45f and phase-align the interference with the output of the main branch40. The adaptive space-time Wiener filter 42 illustratively includes aWiener filter estimator 47 receiving as inputs the output x_(O)(k) ofthe main branch 40 and the outputs x₁(k), x₂(k), and x₃(k) of the signalblocking branch 41. A Wiener filter 48 receives the outputs x₁(k),x₂(k), and x₃(k) of the signal blocking branch 41 as well as the outputW of the Wiener filter estimator 47. Furthermore, a summer subtracts theoutput of the Wiener filter 48 from the output x_(O)(k) of the mainbranch 40 to provide the final filtered signal u(k).

The structure of the two-dimensional Wiener filter 48 having anoversampling ratio of two is now described with reference to FIG. 3. Thefilter 48 includes a respective branch 50 a-50 c for each of thesub-channel outputs x₁(k), x₂(k), and x₃(k) of the signal blockingbranch 41. Each branch 50 a-50 c includes a plurality of parallel gainmultiplier stages 52 each having an input and an output, and all of theoutputs are connected to a summer 53. Moreover, a respective delay stage51 is connected between the inputs of each adjacent pair of gainmultiplier stages 52 such that the delay stages are series-connected toone another as shown. The outputs of the branch summers 53 are in turnsummed by a summer 54, which provides the output of the Wiener filter48.

In general, the solution of the 2D Wiener filter is W with the length of(N−1)×M:W=(B ^(H) B)⁻¹ B ^(H) a,  (2)wherea=[x ₀(M−1), x ₀(M), . . . x ₀(K)]^(T),  (3)and x₀(k) is the output of the main branch 40. K is the number ofsymbols in a burst, and M is the number of taps of the filter in thetime domain, where

$\begin{matrix}{B = {\begin{bmatrix}{x_{1}( {M - 1} )} & \cdots & {x_{1}(0)} & \cdots & \cdots & {x_{N - 1}( {M - 1} )} & \cdots & {x_{N - 1}(0)} \\{x_{1}(M)} & \cdots & {x_{1}(1)} & \cdots & \cdots & {x_{N - 1}(M)} & \cdots & {x_{N - 1}(1)} \\\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\{x_{1}(K)} & \cdots & {x_{1}( {K - M + 1} )} & \cdots & \cdots & {x_{\;{N\; - \; 1}}(K)} & \cdots & {x_{N - 1}( {K - M + 1} )}\end{bmatrix}.}} & (4)\end{matrix}$Furthermore, x_(n)(k)'s are the output of the signal blocking branch 41.

To provide the necessary accuracy to achieve the DARP requirements,Applicants theorize without wishing to be bound thereto that certainchannel estimation enhancements may be used. Two such enhancements mayinclude: (1) CIR improvement with the constant modulus property of theinterference taken into consideration; and (2) usingsubspace-finding-based channel estimation methods such as those reportedin the Liang et al. article entitled “A Two-Stage Hybrid Approach forCCI/ISI Reduction with Space-Time Processing,” IEEE CommunicationsLetters, pp. 163-165, November 1997, and the Klang et al. articleentitled “Structured Semi-Blind Interference Rejection in DispersiveMultichannel Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Volume50, Issue 8, August 2002, both of which are hereby incorporated hereinin their entireties by reference. Generally speaking, the approaches in(2) take into account the interference in the optimization target, andthese methods use an Eigenvalue or singular decomposition computation.

More particularly, the channel estimation stage 33 may estimate thechannel impulse response (CIR) of the wanted signal based upon the knowntraining sequence included in the received signal burst. One approachfor doing so is to perform a cross-correlation of the training sequenceand the received samples. Another approach is to use a least-squarechannel estimation based upon the training sequence. Still anotherapproach is based upon a maximization of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)of the received samples of the training sequence. The channel estimationis the Eigenvector of the largest Eigenvalue in the signal subspace(EVD). Yet another approach is based upon constant modulus interferenceremoval, where an initial channel estimate is taken from theleast-square estimator. One further approach is based upon constantmodulus signal removal and initial EVD estimation. A mean-squared errorfor each of the five above-described channel estimation approaches hasbeen simulated for the receiver 30, and the results are shown in thegraph of FIG. 4.

Applicants have also simulated overall performance of the receiver 30and have noted improvements with respect to the prior art receiver 20for known desired signals CIR using the above-described ICMF SAIC. Theresults of these simulations are shown in the graph of FIG. 5. The blockerror rate of the DARP-capable GSM receiver 30 was collected andcompared with that of the conventional receiver 20. The logical channelused in the simulation is CS-1. The fading channel is TU50 km/h-1950 MHzand the interference configuration is DTS-1 as proposed in GP-042829,Change Request—45.005 CR 092 Rev 2, 3GPP TSG-GERAN Meeting # 22,GP-042829, November 2004. An oversampling ratio of 1 (N=2) and 2 (N=4)and the temporal filter length of M=1, 2, and 3 were used in thesimulations as shown. Generally speaking, the DARP-capable GSM receiver30 demonstrated up to 5 dB improvement under the simulation (CS-1, TU50km/h-1950 MHz, DTS-1), provided that the channel impulse response of thewanted signal was known.

Some advantages of the SAIC ICMF approach outlined above include itsrelative simplicity (i.e., relatively low computational complexity) androbustness (i.e., it makes very few assumptions about the source of theinterference). In addition, this approach allows the existing GSMViterbi equalizer structure to be used, as the solution is integrated asa pre-processing step on the input data, as discussed further above.

An alternative embodiment of the ICMF receiver 32′ and correspondingmethod steps are now described with reference to FIGS. 6 through 8.Beginning at Block 70, as discussed above an antenna array (i.e., realor virtual) receives the signal burst (e.g., from a base station in acellular network) which includes a training sequence therein, at Block71. Again, an adaptive space-time (e.g., Wiener) filter 42′ is connectedto the virtual antenna array and has settable filter coefficients w. TheICMF 30′ further illustratively includes a CIR estimator 33′, which mayestimate the CIR based upon cross-correlation, least square,maximization of SNR, constant modulus interference removal, EVD, orother techniques, as discussed further above, based upon the trainingsequence (Blocks 72, 72′).

In the present embodiment, the signal blocker 41′ is operativelyconnected between the CIR estimator 33′ and the adaptive space-timefilter 42′ so that the filter coefficients thereof are set based uponthe training sequence and not the whole signal burst, at Block 73.However, the Wiener filter 48′ is then applied to the whole signal burstto remove the unwanted interference (Block 74), thus concluding themethod illustrated in FIG. 7 (Block 75). Applicants theorize, withoutwishing to be bound thereto, that estimating the channel response basedupon the training sequence portion of the received signal burst willprovide a more accurate estimation than performing channel estimationover the entire signal burst, resulting in improved interferencecancellation.

More particularly, the signal blocker 41′ illustratively includes aconvolver 55′ that re-modulates the training sequence by convolving thetraining sequence with the estimated channel response (Block 80′). Asummer 56′ of the signal blocker 41′ then subtracts the re-modulatedtraining sequence from corresponding received signals, as shown in FIG.6 (Block 81′). As discussed further above, the interference filteringoperation includes generating an interference estimation using theWeiner filter 48′, at Block 82′, and then subtracting the interferenceestimation from the received signal burst using the summer 49′, at Block83′.

One example of a hand-held mobile wireless communications device 1000that may be used in accordance with the system 20 is further describedin the example below with reference to FIG. 9. The device 1000illustratively includes a housing 1200, a keypad 1400 and an outputdevice 1600. The output device shown is a display 1600, which ispreferably a full graphic LCD. Other types of output devices mayalternatively be utilized. A processing device 1800 is contained withinthe housing 1200 and is coupled between the keypad 1400 and the display1600. The processing device 1800 controls the operation of the display1600, as well as the overall operation of the mobile device 1000, inresponse to actuation of keys on the keypad 1400 by the user.

The housing 1200 may be elongated vertically, or may take on other sizesand shapes (including clamshell housing structures). The keypad mayinclude a mode selection key, or other hardware or software forswitching between text entry and telephony entry.

In addition to the processing device 1800, other parts of the mobiledevice 1000 are shown schematically in FIG. 9. These include acommunications subsystem 1001; a short-range communications subsystem1020; the keypad 1400 and the display 1600, along with otherinput/output devices 1060, 1080, 1100 and 1120; as well as memorydevices 1160, 1180 and various other device subsystems 1201. The mobiledevice 1000 is preferably a two-way RF communications device havingvoice and data communications capabilities. In addition, the mobiledevice 1000 preferably has the capability to communicate with othercomputer systems via the Internet.

Operating system software executed by the processing device 1800 ispreferably stored in a persistent store, such as the flash memory 1160,but may be stored in other types of memory devices, such as a read onlymemory (ROM) or similar storage element. In addition, system software,specific device applications, or parts thereof, may be temporarilyloaded into a volatile store, such as the random access memory (RAM)1180. Communications signals received by the mobile device may also bestored in the RAM 1180.

The processing device 1800, in addition to its operating systemfunctions, enables execution of software applications 1300A-1300N on thedevice 1000. A predetermined set of applications that control basicdevice operations, such as data and voice communications 1300A and1300B, may be installed on the device 1000 during manufacture. Inaddition, a personal information manager (PIM) application may beinstalled during manufacture. The PIN is preferably capable oforganizing and managing data items, such as e-mail, calendar events,voice mails, appointments, and task items. The PIM application is alsopreferably capable of sending and receiving data items via a wirelessnetwork 1401. Preferably, the PIN data items are seamlessly integrated,synchronized and updated via the wireless network 1401 with the deviceuser's corresponding data items stored or associated with a hostcomputer system.

Communication functions, including data and voice communications, areperformed through the communications subsystem 1001, and possiblythrough the short-range communications subsystem. The communicationssubsystem 1001 includes a receiver 1500, a transmitter 1520, and one ormore antennas 1540 and 1560. In addition, the communications subsystem1001 also includes a processing module, such as a digital signalprocessor (DSP) 1580, and local oscillators (LOs) 1601. The specificdesign and implementation of the communications subsystem 1001 isdependent upon the communications network in which the mobile device1000 is intended to operate. For example, a mobile device 1000 mayinclude a communications subsystem 1001 designed to operate with theMobitex™, Data TAC™ or General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) mobile datacommunications networks, and also designed to operate with any of avariety of voice communications networks, such as AMPS, TDMA, CDMA,WCDMA, PCS, GSM, EDGE, etc. Other types of data and voice networks, bothseparate and integrated, may also be utilized with the mobile device1000. The mobile device 1000 may also be compliant with othercommunications standards such as 3GSM, 3GPP, UMTS, etc.

Network access requirements vary depending upon the type ofcommunication system. For example, in the Mobitex and DataTAC networks,mobile devices are registered on the network using a unique personalidentification number or PIN associated with each device. In GPRSnetworks, however, network access is associated with a subscriber oruser of a device. A GPRS device therefore requires a subscriber identitymodule, commonly referred to as a SIM card, in order to operate on aGPRS network.

When required network registration or activation procedures have beencompleted, the mobile device 1000 may send and receive communicationssignals over the communication network 1401. Signals received from thecommunications network 1401 by the antenna 1540 are routed to thereceiver 1500, which provides for signal amplification, frequency downconversion, filtering, channel selection, etc., and may also provideanalog to digital conversion. Analog-to-digital conversion of thereceived signal allows the DSP 1580 to perform more complexcommunications functions, such as demodulation and decoding. In asimilar manner, signals to be transmitted to the network 1401 areprocessed (e.g. modulated and encoded) by the DSP 1580 and are thenprovided to the transmitter 1520 for digital to analog conversion,frequency up conversion, filtering, amplification and transmission tothe communication network 1401 (or networks) via the antenna 1560.

In addition to processing communications signals, the DSP 1580 providesfor control of the receiver 1500 and the transmitter 1520. For example,gains applied to communications signals in the receiver 1500 andtransmitter 1520 may be adaptively controlled through automatic gaincontrol algorithms implemented in the DSP 1580.

In a data communications mode, a received signal, such as a text messageor web page download, is processed by the communications subsystem 1001and is input to the processing device 1800. The received signal is thenfurther processed by the processing device 1800 for an output to thedisplay 1600, or alternatively to some other auxiliary I/O device 1060.A device user may also compose data items, such as e-mail messages,using the keypad 1400 and/or some other auxiliary I/O device 1060, suchas a touchpad, a rocker switch, a thumb-wheel, or some other type ofinput device. The composed data items may then be transmitted over thecommunications network 1401 via the communications subsystem 1001.

In a voice communications mode, overall operation of the device issubstantially similar to the data communications mode, except thatreceived signals are output to a speaker 1100, and signals fortransmission are generated by a microphone 1120. Alternative voice oraudio I/O subsystems, such as a voice message recording subsystem, mayalso be implemented on the device 1000. In addition, the display 1600may also be utilized in voice communications mode, for example todisplay the identity of a calling party, the duration of a voice call,or other voice call related information.

The short-range communications subsystem enables communication betweenthe mobile device 1000 and other proximate systems or devices, whichneed not necessarily be similar devices. For example, the short-rangecommunications subsystem may include an infrared device and associatedcircuits and components, or a Bluetooth™ communications module toprovide for communication with similarly-enabled systems and devices.

Many modifications and other embodiments will come to the mind of oneskilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in theforegoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it isunderstood that various modifications and embodiments are intended to beincluded within the scope of the appended claims.

1. An interference cancelling matched filter system comprising: anantenna array for receiving a signal burst including a training sequencetherein; an adaptive space-time filter connected to said antenna arrayand having settable filter coefficients; a channel impulse responseestimator for estimating a channel impulse response based upon thetraining sequence; and a signal blocker operatively connected betweensaid channel impulse response estimator and said adaptive space-timefilter so that the filter coefficients thereof are set based upon thetraining sequence and not the whole signal burst.
 2. The interferencecanceling matched filter system of claim 1 wherein said signal blockersubtracts a re-modulated training sequence from corresponding receivedsignals.
 3. The interference canceling matched filter system of claim 2wherein said signal blocker comprises a summer and a convolver connectedthereto; and wherein said convolver re-modulates the training sequenceby convolving the training sequence with the estimated channel response.4. The interference canceling matched filter system of claim 1 whereinsaid antenna array comprises a virtual antenna array.
 5. Theinterference canceling matched filter system of claim 1 wherein saidadaptive space-time filter comprises a Wiener filter for generating aninterference estimation.
 6. The interference canceling matched filtersystem of claim 5 wherein said adaptive space-time filter furthercomprises a summer for subtracting the interference estimation from thereceived signal burst.
 7. The interference canceling matched filtersystem of claim 1 wherein said channel impulse response estimatorestimates the channel impulse response based upon a cross-correlation ofthe training sequence and the received signal burst.
 8. The interferencecanceling matched filter system of claim 1 wherein said channel impulseresponse estimator estimates the channel impulse response using aleast-square channel estimation based upon the training sequence.
 9. Theinterference canceling matched filter system of claim 1 wherein saidchannel impulse response estimator estimates the channel impulseresponse based upon a maximization of a signal-to-noise ratio of thereceived signals corresponding to the training sequence.
 10. Theinterference canceling matched filter system of claim 1 wherein saidchannel impulse response estimator estimates the channel response basedupon constant modulus interference removal.
 11. The interferencecanceling matched filter system of claim 1 wherein said channel impulseresponse estimator estimates the channel response based upon a signalsubspace finding and the use of an Eigenvector decomposition.
 12. Aninterference cancelling matched filter system comprising: a virtualantenna array for receiving a signal burst including a training sequencetherein; an adaptive space-time filter connected to said virtual antennaarray and having settable filter coefficients; a channel impulseresponse estimator for estimating a channel impulse response based uponthe training sequence; and a signal blocker operatively connectedbetween said channel impulse response estimator and said adaptivespace-time filter so that the filter coefficients thereof are set basedupon the training sequence and not the whole signal burst; said signalblocker subtracting a re-modulated training sequence from correspondingreceived signals.
 13. The interference canceling matched filter systemof claim 12 wherein said signal blocker comprises a summer and aconvolver connected thereto; and wherein said convolver re-modulates thetraining sequence by convolving the training sequence with the estimatedchannel response.
 14. The interference canceling matched filter systemof claim 12 wherein said adaptive space-time filter comprises: a Wienerfilter for generating an interference estimation; and a summer forsubtracting the interference estimation from the received signal burst.15. A wireless communications device comprising: a wireless transmitterand a wireless receiver; said wireless receiver comprising aninterference cancelling matched filter system comprising an antennaarray for receiving a signal burst including a training sequencetherein, an adaptive space-time filter connected to said antenna arrayand having settable filter coefficients, a channel impulse responseestimator for estimating a channel impulse response based upon thetraining sequence, and a signal blocker operatively connected betweensaid channel impulse response estimator and said adaptive space-timefilter so that the filter coefficients thereof are set based upon thetraining sequence and not the whole signal burst.
 16. The wirelesscommunications device of claim 15 wherein said signal blocker subtractsa re-modulated training sequence from corresponding received signals.17. The wireless communications device of claim 16 wherein said signalblocker comprises a summer and a convolver connected thereto; andwherein said convolver re-modulates the training sequence by convolvingthe training sequence with the estimated channel response.
 18. Thewireless communications device of claim 15 wherein said antenna arraycomprises a virtual antenna array.
 19. An interference canceling matchedfiltering method comprising: receiving a signal burst including atraining sequence therein using an antenna array; estimating a channelimpulse response based upon the training sequence; and filtering thereceived signal burst using an adaptive space-time filter havingsettable filter coefficients, and performing signal blocking on thereceived signal burst so that the filter coefficients of the adaptivespace-time filter are set based upon the training sequence and not thewhole signal burst.
 20. The method of claim 19 wherein signal blockingcomprises subtracting a re-modulated training sequence fromcorresponding received signals.
 21. The method of claim 20 furthercomprising convolving the training sequence with the estimated channelresponse to generate the re-modulated training sequence.
 22. The methodof claim 19 wherein the antenna array comprises a virtual antenna array.23. The method of claim 19 wherein the adaptive space-time filtercomprises a Wiener filter for generating an interference estimation. 24.The method of claim 23 wherein the adaptive space-time filter furthercomprises a summer for subtracting the interference estimation from thereceived signal burst.
 25. The method of claim 19 wherein estimating thechannel impulse response comprises estimating the channel impulseresponse based upon a cross-correlation of the training sequence and thereceived signal burst.
 26. The method of claim 19 wherein estimating thechannel impulse response comprises estimating the channel impulseresponse using a least-square channel estimation based upon the trainingsequence.
 27. The method of claim 19 wherein estimating the channelimpulse response comprises estimating the channel impulse response basedupon a maximization of a signal-to-noise ratio of the received signalscorresponding to the training sequence.
 28. The method of claim 19wherein estimating the channel impulse response comprises estimating thechannel impulse response based upon constant modulus interferenceremoval.
 29. The method of claim 19 wherein estimating the channelimpulse response comprises estimating the channel impulse response basedupon a signal subspace finding and the use of an Eigenvectordecomposition.